Legal Opinion

Ascencio-Contreras v. Rosen

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 12, 2021No. 17-4038-agUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

17-4038-ag Ascencio-Contreras v. Rosen UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT'S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION "SUMMARY ORDER"). A PARTY CITING A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Yan Chen v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General, 1Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  2. Xue Hong Yang v. United States Department of Justice and Attorney General GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  3. Moncrieffe v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. Bah v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  5. Corley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API