Legal Opinion

Raynolds v. Browning, King & Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 6, 1926PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinch, J.

The question presented for decision is whether certain specific powers granted to a testamentary trustee under a will are sufficiently broad to give validity to a lease made by him for *445twenty-one years and six months/ with an election in the tenant to have a further lease for a further term of twenty-one years following the expiration of the previous term, the further lease to contain covenants, agreements and conditions identical with those contained in the first lease, except as to certain provisions providing for the ascertaining of what augmentation of rent, if any, should take place…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Furniss v. . CruikshankNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  2. Conaughty v. . the Saratoga County BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  3. Weir v. BarkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  4. Masset v. . RuhNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  5. 39 Cortlandt Street Corp. v. LambertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Urquhart v. UrquhartNew York Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Simco Retail Stores v. Gross Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
  3. Frankford Trust Co. v. D. A. Schulte, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  4. Keith v. WeinbergNew York Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Victory Lunch, Inc. v. CarllNew York Supreme Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API