Legal Opinion

Adamson v. Lang

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 13, 1964PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.

This action was brought by 87 persons as plaintiffs, to recover amounts paid by each of them for the purchase of shares of stock in Ore-Mont Oil Corporation. They also prayed for interest, attorney fees, and costs. Defendant Lang, who made no defense to this action, was the promoter, organizer, and executive officer of the corporation. It is alleged that Hyde, hereafter referred to as defendant, participated with Lang in the sale of the corporation’s stock in violation of the provisions of Chapter 59, Oregon Revised Statutes.

The corporation was formed to finance drilling for oil on Montana…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mosley v. UnruhSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Badger v. Paulson Investment Co., Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Tualatin Tire & Auto, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Black & Company v. Nova-Tech, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 1971
  4. Adams v. American Western Securities, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Spears v. Lawrence Securities, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1965

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API