Legal Opinion

Moody v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

North Carolina Business Court

Decided May 7, 2007No. 02-CVS-4892PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Moody v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.,

2007 NCBC 13

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION COUNTY OF NEW HANOVER 02 CVS 4892 WILLIAM MOODY, JR., on behalf ) himself and others similarly situated, ) ) ) Plaintiff, 1 ORDER AND OPINION ) v. ) ) SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO., ) ) Defendant. ) Sunlight is said to be the best of disinfectants; electric light the most efficient policeman. Louis D. Brandeis, Other People's Money and How the Bankers Use It {I) This case arises out of Plaintiff's suit for damages based on Defendant's pricing of automotive wheel alignment…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. The United States v. Hudson and GoodwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1812
  3. Fauntleroy v. LumSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. McDonald v. MabeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  5. Crow v. Citicorp Acceptance Co., Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Teague v. Bayer AgNorth Carolina Business Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API