Legal Opinion
Recreation Services, Inc. Defined Benefit Plan v. Utah Mortgage Co.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided September 19, 1989No. 89 C 3295PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BRIAN BARNETT DUFF, District Judge.
The Recreation Services, Inc. Defined Benefit Plan has moved for judgment on its First Amended Complaint under Rule 12(c), Fed.R.Civ.P., against Utah Mortgage Company for the dishonor of a check in the amount of $39,494.00. In considering this motion, the court must view the facts presented in the pleadings and the inferences drawn from those facts in the light most favorable to the nonmovant, Utah Mortgage. This means that the court must accept Utah Mortgage's allegations in its Answer to the Plan’s First Amended Complaint, and treat the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Gerber v. First National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
- Steven v. Falese Land Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1977
- Biggs v. World Air Conditioning, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1986
- Leopold v. HalleckAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
3Cited by3 opinions
- Chavarria v. Fleetwood Retail Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
- Chavarria v. Fleetwood Retail Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
- Recreation Services, Inc. Defined Benefit Plan v. Utah Mortgage Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990