Shea v. Teachers' Retirement System
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Dissent
Nunez, J. (dissenting).
In my view an affirmance herein sets a dangerous precedent and may tend to undermine the stability of pension systems. The pensioner’s estate will now recover the maximum benefit which the pensioner could have selected but did not. And this remarkable result has been accomplished by the claim that defendants-appellants were negligent in failing to give enough information with respect to the options in a pamphlet sent to all members of the system and found among decedent’s possessions on her death. There is no evidence whatever that she relied on the pamphlet nor indeed…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- City of New York v. Wilson & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1938
- New York City Employees' Retirement System v. EliotNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
- Matter of Creveling v. Teachers' Ret. BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Matter of Zucker v. New York City Employees'ret. Sys.New York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Zucker v. New York City Employees' Retirement SystemAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.