Legal Opinion

Metzenberger v. Keil

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 10, 1888PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Henry Circuit Court, Hon. I). A. DeArmond, Judge. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtPhilips, P. J.

This is an action by attachment. The issue was tried on the plea in abatement, and found for the plaintiffs. Prom the judgment rendered thereon, and before any judgment on the merits, the defendant appealed.

Prior to the revision of 1879, it was held that no appeal would lie from a judgment on a plea in abatement. Davis v. Perry, 46 Mo. 449; Jones v. Snodgrass, 54 Mo. 597. Under section 439, Revised Statutes, 1879, it is permitted to a plaintiff, against whom judgment has gone on the plea in abatement, to take an appeal therefrom without awaiting final judgment on the merits. But where the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hicks v. MartinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. Davis v. PerrySupreme Court of Missouri · 1870
  3. Duncan v. ForgeyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1887
  4. Jones v. SnodgrassSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wirt v. DinanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Mackey v. HyattMissouri Court of Appeals · 1890
  3. Bagley v. KellyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1890
  4. Houchin v. TurnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914
  5. Osborne & Co. v. Farmers' Machine Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API