Legal Opinion

Andrews v. Worcester, Nashua, & Rochester Railroad

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 17, 1893PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLathrop, J.

This is a bill in equity by the executor of the •will of Vienna McKean, to compel the defendant corporation to issue a certificate for five shares of its capital stock to the plaintiff, and to restrain the defendant, Timothy W. Hammond, from interfering with or preventing the issue of such certificate.

*65Vienna McKean was the executrix and residuary legatee of Albert McKean, who at one time was the owner of the five shares in question. He transferred them to his son, Frank A. McKean, and a new certificate was issued in the name of Frank, bearing date December 1, 1884. It appears that Frank did…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kohl v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. McNeil v. . the Tenth National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  3. Holbrook v. . New Jersey Zinc Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1874
  4. Merchants' Insurance Co. of Providence v. AbbottMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
  5. Burt v. Merchants' InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bone v. HolmesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  2. Bellows Falls Power Co. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
  3. Ratshesky v. PiscopoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  4. Taft v. ChurchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
  5. Lane v. Volunteer Co-operative BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API