Acme United Corp. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Acme United Corp. (“Acme”) was sued by one of its competitors, Fiskars Brands, Inc. (“Fiskars”), for allegedly making false and disparaging statements about Fiskars’ products in its advertising. Acme tendered the Fiskars lawsuit to its commercial insurer, St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Co. (“St. Paul”), but St. Paul denied Acme’s request for coverage and disclaimed any duty to defend. After settling with Fiskars, Acme sued St. Paul to recover the costs of its defense. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of St. Paul. Acme appeals. We reverse and remand for entry of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Folkman v. QuammeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- Elliott v. DonahueWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
- McNeilab Inc. v. American Home Products CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. GilletteWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
- Microtec Research, Inc. Jerry Kirk v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jar Laboratories LLC v. Great American E & S InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
- E.S.Y., Inc. v. Scottsdale InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2015
- Vitamin Health, Inc. v. Hartford Casualty Insurance Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2016
- Tzumi Electronics LLC v. The Burlington Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2024