Legal Opinion

St. Clair v. State

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1919No. 20528PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to the district court for Buffalo county: Bruno O. Hostetler, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtCornish, J.

Defendant (plaintiff in error) was convicted of receiving stolen property.

Section 8630, Rev. St. 1913, on winch, the information was based, is in part as follows: “Whoever receives or buys any goods or chattels of the value of thirty-five dollars, or upwards,, that shall he stolen or taken by robbers, with intent to defraud the owner,” etc.

It is argued that, although guilty knowledge is an element of the crime charged, neither those words nor their equivalent are contained in the statute. The charge that goods were received from A. (the robbei), with intent to defraud B. (the owner), by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Goldsberry v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Clark v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sheppard v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Neal v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Mason v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Foreman v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Katleman v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1919

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API