Legal Opinion
Hurst v. Stone
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Decided December 20, 1872Published
APPEAL FROM TODD CIRCUIT COURT.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Lindsay:
Mrs. Hurst did not hold the lot mortgaged to appellees as separate estate, although the title was conveyed to a trustee. It being general estate, she had the power in conjunction with her husband to bind it by mortgage, to secure the payment of the husband’s debt. Sharp’s Adm’r v. Proctor’s Adm’r and Heirs, 5 Bush 396.
The court below did not e.rr in enforcing the mortgage, and the judgment must be affirmed.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Sharp's adm'r v. Proctor's adm'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1869