Legal Opinion

Reger v. Sours

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 8, 1957No. 40,511PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Wertz, J.:

This was an action to compel specific performance of an option contract. The defense to the action was that plaintiff (appellee) had breached the lease and option agreement so that the option had terminated at the time he attempted to exercise it. From a judgment ordering specific performance defendants (appellants) appeal to this court and specify error on five points. The first three refer to trial errors. Defendants did file a motion for a new trial which was overruled, but the ruling is not specified as error. We have repeatedly held that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Drollinger v. CarsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  2. Gale v. Fruehauf Trailer Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1944
  3. McIntyre v. DickinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  4. Board of County Commissioners v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  5. McCarty v. Kansas-Nebraska Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1954

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Loose v. BrubacherSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  2. Shelton v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  3. Green v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  4. Duffin v. PatrickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
  5. In Re Estate of WurtzSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API