Legal Opinion · Dissent

Cranston v. Bodkin

California Supreme Court

Decided August 25, 1966No. L. A. No. 28168Published

1DissentTraynor, C. J.

I dissent. The Legislature has provided in plain terms that every transfer by will is subject to the inheritance tax.1 A testator’s transfer by bequest or devise in performance of an agreement is no less a “transfer by will” than a bequest or devise for any other purpose. Nothing in the present statute or its prede*157cessors suggests that a transfer by will pursuant to an enforceable contract is excepted from the normal operation of the tax. In all the years since the Legislature first selected succession as a subject of tax (Stats. 1853, ch. 127, art. V [Comp. Laws of Cal., Garfielde, 1853, p.…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Stebbins v. RileySupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Brewer v. SimpsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Brown v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Estate of MadisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  5. In Re the Appraisal for Taxation, Under the Act in Relation to Taxable Transfers of Property, of the Estate of GouldNew York Court of Appeals · 1898

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API