Legal Opinion

Jordan's Mut. Aid Ass'n v. Asberry

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided April 10, 1934No. 6 Div. 522PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRICKEN, Presiding Judge.

This cause was tried by the court, no demand for a jury trial being made.

The complaint contained one count. There was no demurrer to the complaint, the defendant pleaded the general issue in short by consent. The court rendered judgment for plaintiff in the sum of $200, and overruled the motion for a new trial.

The suit was based upon a burial insurance policy issued by appellant to Anderson Smith, as the insured, and appellee, as the beneficiary.

Appellant first insists that error prevailed in the action of the court in overruling defendant’s demurrer to the complaint.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Travelers' Ins. Co. v. PlasterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  2. Maryland Casualty Co. v. TerryAlabama Court of Appeals · 1930

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. SuttlesAlabama Court of Appeals · 1934
  2. W. H. Luquire Burial Ass'n v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1937
  3. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. SuttlesAlabama Court of Appeals · 1934
  4. W. H. Luquire Burial Ass'n v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API