Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Timmons v. Pecorino

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 17, 1998No. 37,733-01PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1ConcurrencePrice, Judge

I concur in the Court’s denial of leave to file, but write separately to explain my reason for doing so.

This case has provided no small amount of humor to many of those familiar with its details (a canine “defendant” named Darth Vader, rumors of a “tainted” dog line-up, a case of canine “capital punishment,” etc.), and no small amount of sadness to many over the imminent destruction of one of “man’s best friends.” Nevertheless, there are significant jurisdictional issues at stake.

Relator’s dog bit a small girl, requiring her to get more than thirty stitches. As a result of this, Relator’s dog…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Edwards v. ReynaTexas Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Armes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  3. City of Lubbock v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
  4. Ex Parte BealCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1952

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re LobanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2008
  2. Ex Parte WolfeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
  3. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports2008
  4. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports2005
  5. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API