UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Louis M. MAYO, Jr., and James Harold Dondich, Defendants-Appellants
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
Appellants Louis M. Mayo and James Harold Dondich appeal from their convictions for mail fraud and securities fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 371, 2314, 1341, 1343 and 15 U.S.C. §§ 77q(a), 77x, 78j(b), 78ff(a). We affirm.
I
FACTS
Appellants Mayo and Dondich were found guilty on all counts of an 18-count indictment. Three co-defendants, Mortensen, Osness, and Jackson, were acquitted on all counts. To sum up a long and complex factual record, the appellants were involved in a scheme to market debt securities of Quimby Island Reclamation District No. 2090 (the District) at a time when it was…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Meachum v. FanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. Willie Decoster, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- Zicarelli v. New Jersey State Commission of InvestigationSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Troy Cooper v. C. J. FitzharrisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James E. KESSI, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Robert E. TuckerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- United States v. David LordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Daniel Nelson SilvaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
- David A. Raley v. Eddie Ylst, Acting Warden of the California State Prison at San QuentinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.