Legal Opinion

Miers v. Columbia Mut. Building & Loan Ass'n

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided November 29, 1907PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In Equity. On exceptions to report of special master.

1Opinion of the Court

HAZEL, District Judge.

The master in chancery has correctly passed upon the objections of the claimant, and his report must be confirmed. The right of a stockholder in a building and loan association to withdraw his installment shares is derived from its by-laws or statute. The by-laws of the respondent association give a member the right to withdraw at any time after one year upon giving 30 days’ notice in writing to the secretary, and thereupon such withdrawing shareholder becomes entitled to receive the full amount paid to the association on his shares, together with interest, less his…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Engelhardt v. Fifth Ward Permanent Dime Saving & Loan Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. Heinbokel v. National Savings, Loan & Bldg. Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  3. Rabbitt v. WilcoxenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  4. Fort Smith Building Ass'n v. CohnSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
  5. Pawlick v. Homestead Loan Ass'nNew York Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. McCormack v. American Building & Loan Ass'nTennessee Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1934
  3. Elson v. Mortgage Building & Loan Ass'nDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1933
  4. Smith v. Oklahoma City Bldg. & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API