Legal Opinion

Solano v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 18, 2005PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge LEADBETTER.

Before this court is the motion of Anthony Solano to vacate the automatic supersedeas which took effect when the Board of Probation and Parole (Board) sought allowance of appeal from this court’s order reversing the revocation of Solano’s parole. It is well-established that in order to prevail on a motion to vacate an automatic supersedeas, the' petitioner must establish: 1) that he is likely to prevail on the merits; 2) that without the requested relief he will suffer irreparable injury; and 8) that the removal of the automatic super-sedeas will not substantially…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission v. Process Gas Consumers GroupSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Elizabeth Forward School District v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rickert v. Latimore TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API