In Re Estate of Niehenke
Washington Supreme Court
1DissentDore, C.J.
(dissenting) — The question in the subject case is who is entitled to exercise the option to purchase the "Home Place". The majority holds that: purchase options are not always "personal" to the optionee; Washington's anti-lapse statute may apply to testamentary options; and that, applying the anti-lapse statute to the option in this case, the surviving children of Francis Niehenke, the testator's grandnieces and grandnephews, are entitled to exercise Francis Niehenke's purchase option. I agree that purchase options are not always "personal" to the optionee and that, in some cases, the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re the Estate of BergauWashington Supreme Court · 1985
- In Re Estate of RiemckeWashington Supreme Court · 1972
- Burg v. Old National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1971
- In Re Estate of MellWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Tuecke v. TueckeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1964
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.