Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Harry S. Stonehill and Robert P. Brooks v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 4, 1969No. 22346PublishedCited by 114 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BELLONI, District Judge.

This appeal1 is from an interlocutory order of the United States District Court for the Central District of California which denied appellants’ motion to suppress evidence in a civil action brought by the United States of America.

The United States, in January, 1965, filed a complaint seeking foreclosure of Federal tax liens securing Federal income tax liabilities outstanding against *740Harry S. Stonehill and Robert P. Brooks for 1958 through 1961, inclusive. Taxpayers (appellants Stonehill and Brooks) moved to suppress certain evidence they claimed had been obtained in…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Byars v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  5. Lustig v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by114 opinions

  1. United States v. JanisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. United States v. Francisco ToscaninoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  3. United States v. John L. MorrowCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  4. United States v. RosenthalCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
  5. Suarez v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1972

109 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API