Specht v. Louisville Water Co.
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Case 46 — -Action by William: Specht against Louisvuxe Water Company fob a Mandatory Injunction. APPEAL FROM JEFFERSON CIRCUIT COURT, CHANCERY DIVISION. Judgment fob ,-Defendant and Plaintiff Appeals.
Read the full summary
Case 46 — -Action by William: Specht against Louisvuxe Water Company fob a Mandatory Injunction. APPEAL FROM JEFFERSON CIRCUIT COURT, CHANCERY DIVISION. Judgment fob ,-Defendant and Plaintiff Appeals. Our contention is: 1. That the appellee, Water Company, has no authority to refuse to furnish water to appellant because h'e violated a rule ■of the company by laying one hundred and seventy feet of water pipe at his own expense and on his own premises, which was connected with the water pipe in his saloon, and which was laid so as to include four cottages belonging to plaintiff and without the…
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion on the court by
JUDGE NUNN
Affirming.
The purpose of this suit was to obtain a mandatory injunction against the appellee, the Louisville Water Company, requiring it to ■ deliver by and through a meter belonging to and constructed by it in the month of May, 1901, opposite the lot of appellant, into the pipe of the appellant on his premises, water with which to sprinkle and clean the streets in front of his saloon, hall, residence and four cottages, all located upon a lot of land owned by appellant; the saloon, hall, and residence occupied by appellant, and the four cottages by his…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Griffin v. Louisville Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1950
- Middletown Water District v. TuckerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1955
- City of Raceland v. ColvinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936