Legal Opinion

Bradford v. Knowles

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 13, 1895No. 691PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Guadalupe. Tried below before Hon. Thomas H. Spooner.

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES, Chief Justice.

There is no statement of facts in the record. It contains, however, conclusions of fact, appearing to have been filed during the term at which the cause was tried, also a number of bills of exceptions relating to testimony, which also appear from the record to have been filed during the term. So far as the record shows, there is no reason why this court should not consider both the conclusions and the bills of exceptions.

Appellant assigns as error, that the bills and the conclusions were not in fact filed by the judge until nine days after adjournment, although appellant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Landa v. HeermannTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. LochlinTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Lenoir v. MarlinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1895
  4. Cleveland v. SimsTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Collins v. KayTexas Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Emery v. BarfieldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  2. Bliss v. San Antonio School BoardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  3. State v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  4. Kemp v. EverettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910
  5. International & G. N. Ry. Co. v. MuddCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API