Legal Opinion

Effray v. Masson

New York Court of Common Pleas

Decided April 4, 1892PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from city court, general term. Action by Melanie Effray against Marie E. Masson, administratrix of Marie Ann Thuillier, deceased. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtPryor, J.

In limine, the respondent urges a point which, if well taken, disposes of the case adversely to the appellant. The contention is that the answer presents no defense to the action; and that, therefore, the exceptions to evidence relied on for reversal are ineffectual to the purpose. It seems, indeed, that no material allegation of the complaint is controverted; but then, at the trial, respondent made no motion for judgment on the pleadings; *354treated the answer as sufficient; recognized the necessity of proving her case; gave in her evidence; and, without objection, allowed appellant to enter on…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Knapp v. . SimonNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  2. Newton v. . HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1852
  3. Starks v. PeopleNew York Supreme Court · 1847
  4. Carpenter v. . WardNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
  5. Morgan v. FreesNew York Supreme Court · 1852

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Alfred Shrimpton & Sons, Ltd. v. DworskyNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1892
  2. Hertz v. MinzesheimerNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1895
  3. Dudley v. SatterleeCity of New York Municipal Court · 1894
  4. Western Nat. Bank v. FlannaganNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API