United States v. S. Birch & Sons Const. Co.
District Court, D. Montana
1Opinion of the Court
PRAY, District Judge.
The defendants filed a motion to dismiss the above entitled action for the reason that the amended complaint fails to state a claim against them, or either of them, upon which relief can be granted. The motion came on regularly for hearing on briefs submitted by counsel for the respective parties.
Counsel contend there can be no recovery against the Surety Company unless within the express terms of the bond, and that if no recovery can be had against the Surety Company, then plaintiff can not maintain an action of this type against the other defendant.
This action was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Massachusetts Bonding & Ins. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937
- United States Ex Rel. Baltimore Cooperage Co. v. McCayDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1928
- United States Ex Rel. P. A. Bourquin & Co. v. Chester Const. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
- United States v. Hercules Co.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1931
- United States ex rel. Taylor v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.District Court, D. Idaho · 1930
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Chemetron Corp. v. George A. Fuller Co.District Court, D. Montana · 1966
- United States ex rel. Miller & Bentley Equipment Co. v. KellyDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1961