Legal Opinion

Reed v. Howard

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1888No. 6136PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error from Kinney. Tried below before Hon. T. M. Paschal.

1Opinion of the Court

Walker, Associate Justice.

February 27, 1885, Howard brought suit against Reed, alleging for cause of action in substance that on February 29, 1884, they agreed together to acquire title to three hundred and twenty acres of land then held by one Haltom under a contract to purchase it from the State; that in pursuance with their contract they bought Haltom’s interest, and he surrendered his contract for purchase with the State; that on the next day, March 1, 1884, the parties, Howard and Roed, each being head of a family, filed an application for pre-emption of one hundred and sixty…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Clements v. LacyTexas Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Gibbons v. BellTexas Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Miller v. RobertsTexas Supreme Court · 1856
  4. Watkins v. GilkersonTexas Supreme Court · 1853
  5. Smock v. TandyTexas Supreme Court · 1866

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Sayers v. PylandTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  2. McCoy v. McCoySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. Cleveland v. MilnerTexas Commission of Appeals · 1943
  4. Yturria v. Kimbro, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1996
  5. Cleveland v. MilnerTexas Supreme Court · 1943

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API