Legal Opinion · Dissent

Mahl v. Principi

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims

Decided June 7, 2001No. 99-1678Published

1DissentSteinberg, Judge

I agree that this case should be remanded for the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA or Board) to consider potentially applicable provisions of the Veterans Claims Assistance Act of 2000, Pub.L. No. 106-475, 114 Stat. 2096 (Nov. 9, 2000) (VCAA).1 However, although the Court has latitude as to whether to consider contentions not raised to the Board, see Maggitt v. West, 202 F.3d 1370, 1378 (Fed.Cir.2000), I disagree with the Court’s refusal to address certain of the appellant’s arguments that are not predicated on the potential applicability of the VCAA. I do acknowledge that the majority’s…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Gilbert v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1990
  4. Kutscherousky v. WestUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1999
  5. Stegall v. WestUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1998

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API