Satterwhite v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
CHRISTIAN, Judge.
The offense is rape; the punishment confinement in the penitentiary for thirty-five years.
Appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence. We deem the evidence sufficient to support the conviction. Appellant admitted the act of intercourse, but declared that prosecutrix consented to such act. Prosecutrix, Angelina Vitopil, and Leonard Shelton testified to facts showing that appellant accomplished the act of intercourse by the use of force, and that prosecutrix put forth her utmost resistance to prevent being outraged. According to their testimony, prosecutrix attempted…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- McKenzie v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Meadors v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
3Cited by11 opinions
- Ledesma v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1944
- Graham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1933
- Capps v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1985
- Campbell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1944
- Forgey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1961
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.