Legal Opinion
In re the Judicial Settlement of the Estate of Schulz
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided November 12, 1928PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Feely, S.
By his last will, testator, after giving a legacy of $500, and another of $100 out of income, directed his executor “ to pay the balance of my said income to my wife, Caroline D. Schulz, ' during the period of her natural life, with the proviso that if said *169allowance to my wife out of my said income is not sufficient for her support, I direct my said Executor to pay to my said wife so much of the principal of my estate as may be necessary for the reasonable support of my said wife. This provision to my said wife is made in lieu of dower.”
From the death of the testator in 1916, and by…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- In Re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of BabcockNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Peck v. . SherwoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Spencer v. . SpencerNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Kearney v. . CruikshankNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Thomas v. . EvansNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ind. Trust Co., Tr. v. Elizabeth WilsonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1937
- Trust Co. v. KennySupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- In re the Estate of HoneNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934