Insurance Companies v. Carrier Companies
Tennessee Supreme Court
PROM SHELBY. Appeal from Chancery Court of Shelby County. L. Lehman, Sp. Ch. Ii. C. Warriner and Frazer & Heath for Cross-complainants.
1Opinion of the CourtSnodgrass, J.
This suit results from the declaration of a liability (not adjudged, because the carrier was not before the Court) against the Cairo, Yincennes and Chicago Line, in the consolidated causes of Deming & Co. et al. v. The Merchants’ Cotton-press and Storage Co. et al., reported in 6 Pickle, 311.
The opinion in these causes, and those to which it refers, gives in full the history of facts out of which the present litigation grows, and none of these facts need be repeated here. It is sufficient to say that the Court then thought, and, on principles there settled, declared, as it now adjudges, that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bacon v. RivesSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Fidelity Insurance v. HuntingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Crump v. ThurberSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Ken Gardner Ford Sales, Inc. (In Re Ken Gardner Ford Sales, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1981
- Judge v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · 1911
- Adams Express Co. v. Chamberlin-Johnson-DuBose Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1912
- Wald-Green Food Corp. v. Acme Fast Freight, Inc.City of New York Municipal Court · 1951
- Warren v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1910