Legal Opinion

Limtung v. Consolidated Edison of New York

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided October 1, 2019No. 1:19-cv-05444Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK aman eenrneromernsarmne ets in sai i a occa oommaousese NE HIN Y. LIM TUNG, Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - against - 19-CV-5444 (RRM) (SJB) CONSOLIDATED EDISON OF NEW YORK; NEW YORK PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION; JOHN B. RHODES; JOHN AURICCHIO, Defendants. pee eee enn K ROSLYNN R. MAUSKOPFE, United States District Judge. On September 25, 2019, Plaintiff Hin Y. Lim Tung (‘Plaintiff’), appearing pro se, brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, against defendants Consolidated Edison of New York (“Con Ed”), New York Public Service…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Ben Gary Triestman v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  3. Granny Goose Foods, Inc. v. Brotherhood of Teamsters & Auto Truck Drivers, Local No. 70Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Kramer v. Time Warner IncCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
  5. Matricia Moore v. Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. And John MorrillCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API