Legal Opinion
Molinari v. City of New York
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 31, 1998PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Frank J. Barbaro, J.
Defendant City of New York now moves pursuant to CPLR 5015 (a) (1) to vacate the judgment entered November 10, 1997 and either to substitute its own “Counter Proposed Judgment” or, in the alternative, to be heard with respect to proposed changes in the methodology for calculating the judgment. Plaintiff has consented to vacating the judgment. The motion to vacate is therefore granted.
*525After reviewing the parties’ submissions, the court concludes that, while the judgment previously entered was correct in most respects, two of the five arguments advanced…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rohring v. City of Niagara FallsNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Rodriguez v. New York City Housing AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- Pay v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Singletary v. Three City CentreNew York Supreme Court · 1993
- Lieberman v. Perez-VeridianoNew York Supreme Court · 1988
3Cited by4 opinions
- Auer v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Bermeo v. AtakentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Guido v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 2000
- Auer v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 2000