Legal Opinion

Vigil v. Arzola

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided September 21, 1984No. 15037PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SOSA, Senior Justice.

This is a termination of employment suit brought by plaintiff Pete Vigil (Vigil) against defendants Tierra Del Sol Housing Corporation (TDS) and the TDS director, Ernesto Arzola (Arzola).

Although three causes of action were brought before the district court, we have only one cause of action before us on certiorari, Vigil’s claim that Arzola and TDS breached his employment contract.

The trial court, at the conclusion of all evidence, dismissed the breach of contract cause of action by granting a Rule 12(b)(6) motion, failure to state a claim upon which relief can be…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McCasland v. PratherNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Bottijliso v. Hutchison Fruit Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Environmental Improvement Division v. AguayoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Burke v. Permian Ford-Lincoln-MercuryNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1981

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. Burk v. K-Mart Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  2. Winters v. Houston Chronicle Publishing Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Richard D. Ellis v. El Paso Natural Gas CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
  4. Melnick v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Shovelin v. Central New Mexico Electric Cooperative, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1993

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API