Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Myers v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 1, 1931No. K-308Published

1Concurrence

GREEN, Judge (concurring).

I concur solely on the ground that this court has twice decided the legal question in controversy in this ease (McKinney v. United States, 62 Ct. Cl. 180 and Elmhirst v. United States, 38 F.(2d) 915, 69 Ct. Cl. 295), and in both instances certiorari has been denied by the Supreme Court. 273 U. S. 716, 47 S. Ct. 108, 71 L. Ed. 855; 282 U. S. 855, 51 S. Ct. 29, 75 L. Ed.-.

LITTLETON, Judge.

It seems to me that a decision in favor of the plaintiff in this case is inconsistent with the intent and purpose of the statutes taxing estates and with the decision in Merchants’…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. United States v. GrimaudSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Brewster v. GageSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. Maryland Casualty Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. Fawcus MacHine Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. United States v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1878

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API