Stanley v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtHammond, J.
The defendant, Stanley, was convicted of unlawful possession and control of a narcotic drug, a misdemeanor, tie contends that heroin, which was taken from him after an arrest which he says was unlawful, was wrongfully admitted at his trial. His reliance is on the combination of the holding of the Supreme Court in Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U. S. 643, 6 L. Ed. 2d 1081, that the proscription of the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States against the use of evidence obtained by an unreasonable search and seizure is made applicable to the States by the Fourteenth Amendment, and the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States v. RabinowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- United States v. Di ReSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Rios v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Trusty v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
- State v. HornadayWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Lee v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
- Robinson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1968
- Myers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.