Legal Opinion

H.K. Porter Company, Inc. v. Metropolitan Dade County and John Dyer, Individually and as Contracting Officer for Metropolitan Dade County

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided August 9, 1993No. 90-5678PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BY THE COURT:

The parties joint motion to withdraw the petition for rehearing and suggestion of rehearing en bane, to vacate panel opinion and to remand based on settlement agreement is GRANTED. The panel opinion, published at 975 F.2d 762 (11th Cir.1992) is VACATED. The judgment of the district court is VACATED and the ease is REMANDED to the district court with instructions that the ease be dismissed. United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U.S. 36, 71 S.Ct. 104, 95 L.Ed. 36 (1950).

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Munsingwear, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. H.K. Porter Company, Inc. v. Metropolitan Dade County, John Dyer, Individually and as Contracting Officer for Metropolitan Dade CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Shuford v. Alabama State Board of EducationDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1994
  2. Brooks v. State Board of ElectionsDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1994
  3. Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. PenaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  4. Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. PenaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  5. Rosenthal v. United Van Lines, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API