Legal Opinion

Frank Sasser v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided November 17, 1965No. 16282_1PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

On November 28, 1960, appellant was convicted as an habitual violator of the narcotics laws pursuant to 26 U.S.C.A. § 7287. Under the circumstances, a sentence of at least ten years was mandatory. The sentence imposed was twelve years imprisonment, subject, however, to the provision of 18.U.S.C.A. § 4208(a) (2), whereby appellant would become eligible for parole at such time as the board of parole might determine. On March 14, 1961, the court, recognizing that it had no authority to invoke Sec. 4208(a) (2), on its own motion corrected the sentence by striking therefrom all reference to that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Henry Hayes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
  2. James S. Gilliam v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States v. Paul C. "Paulie" VillanoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
  2. United States v. PensonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  3. People v. AllenIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Robert James Garcia v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
  5. People v. RedmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API