Carol Sachs v. Republic of Austria
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1DissentO’Scannlain, Circuit Judge
with whom KÓZINSKI, Chief Judge, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judge,
join:
Because I am not persuaded that an instrumentality of the Republic of Austria may be subjected to the jurisdiction of the United States Courts on the basis of the facts alleged in this case, I must respectfully dissent from the decision of the en banc court to the contrary.
I
The Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of 1976 (FSIA) is “the sole basis for obtaining jurisdiction over a foreign state in our courts.” Argentine Republic v. Amerada Hess Shipping Corp., 488 U.S. 428, 434, 109 S.Ct. 683, 102 L.Ed.2d 818 (1989). Under the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
- Argentine Republic v. Amerada Hess Shipping Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Saudi Arabia v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- First National City Bank v. Banco Para El Comercio Exterior De CubaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Dole Food Co. v. PatricksonSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.