Legal Opinion

Kendall v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided January 18, 1924PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by Chief

Justice Sampson

Affirming.

This prosecution against appellant Kendall for unlawfully possessing intoxicating liquors was had upon a warrant issued by the judge of the Meade quarterly court. After conviction in that court Kendall prosecuted the appeal to the circuit court, where he was again convicted and his punishment fixed at a fine of $100.00 and thirty days in jail. Judgment being entered thereon in accordance with the verdict he appeals to this court.

As grounds for a reversal.he insists:(1) That his demurrer to the warrant should have, ■been sustained because…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mattingly v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  2. Commonwealth v. O'Bryan, Utley & Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  3. Day & Congleton Lumber Co. v. Stadler & Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1902

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Walker v. PennerOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Chapman v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
  3. Barnett v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1925
  4. Copley v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
  5. Sackler v. SacklerNew York Supreme Court · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API