Territory v. Stone
Supreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota
Writ of Error to the YcmJcton County District Court. The facts are stated in the opinion. I. A certificate in the' language following, to-wit: “ Upon reading the foregoing exceptions and finding the same correct, I hereby certify the same to be correct, and to contain in substance all the evidence which was given upon the trial of the above action,” is sufficient to authorize the Appellate Court to review the evidence and determine whether the same is sufficient to warrant…
Read the full summary
Writ of Error to the YcmJcton County District Court. The facts are stated in the opinion. I. A certificate in the' language following, to-wit: “ Upon reading the foregoing exceptions and finding the same correct, I hereby certify the same to be correct, and to contain in substance all the evidence which was given upon the trial of the above action,” is sufficient to authorize the Appellate Court to review the evidence and determine whether the same is sufficient to warrant conviction. (The People v. Getty, 49 Cal., 581; The People v. Fisher, 51 Cal., 319; The People v. York, 9 Cal., 421.) II.…
1Opinion of the CourtShannon, C. J.
The indictment charges that the defendant did unlawfully and knowingly permit a certain building owned by him to be kept and maintained as a house of ill fame, resorted to and visited by divers persons for the purpose of prostitution, unlawful sexual intercourse and lewdness, and for other lewd, indecent, and obscene purposes.
It is founded upon sections 370 and 372, of Chapter 33, of the Penal Code, which are as follows: “§ 370. Every person who keeps any bawdy house, house of ill fame, of assignation, or of prostitution, or any other house or place for persons to visit for unlawful sexual…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Barrett v. . the Third Avenue R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Lamb v. Camden & Amboy Railroad & Transportation Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Hill v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
- People v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
- People v. ErwinNew York Supreme Court · 1847
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MurrSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
- State v. HendricksMontana Supreme Court · 1895
- Putman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
- State v. HarrisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1905
- Larson v. ChristiansonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1905
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.