Legal Opinion
Christian v. Betak
District Court, N.D. California
Decided June 20, 2025No. 3:24-cv-01867Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 DONALD J. CHRISTIAN, Case No. 24-cv-01867-TSH 8 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR 9 v. ATTORNEY’S FEES 10 GEORGE M. BETAK, Re: Dkt. No. 50 11 Defendant. 12 13 I. INTRODUCTION 14 On May 13, 2025, Plaintiff Donald J. Christian voluntarily dismissed his claims in this 15 case. Defendant George M. Betak’s now moves for attorney’s fees pursuant to Federal Rule of 16 Civil Procedure 54(d) and California Penal Code section 502(e)(2). ECF No. 50. Christian filed 17 an Opposition (ECF No. 51) and Betak filed a Reply (ECF No.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Szabo Food Service, Inc. v. Canteen CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Concha v. LondonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Keller v. State Bar of CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Abrams v. Lightolier Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.