Drawdy v. State

The plaintiff in error was indicted and convicted of the unmentionable crime and seeks reversal of the judgment on writ of error.

The evidence we deemed to be sufficient to sustain the verdict. A diseusssion of it is unnecessary as it would serve no useful purpose. Two witnesses saw the accused in the act and so testified. They were unable to say that there was actual emission and counsel contend that as such fact is a necessary ingredient of the crime the circumstances to which the witnesses testified were not sufficient to exclude the inference that it did not occur; that the rule in…