Jannaccio v. Board of Elections
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Contrary to the appellants’ contention, their petition to validate was insufficiently pleaded as a matter of law. Such a validating petition must specify the individual determinations by the Board of Elections (hereinafter the Board) that the candidate claims were erroneous, or the signatures that the candidate claims the Board improperly invalidated (see Matter of Krueger v Richards, 59 NY2d 680, 682; Matter of Green v Mahr, 231 AD2d 480). Since the appellants’ validating petition was not sufficiently particularized to give the Supreme Court and the parties notice of the Board’s…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- MATTER OF KRUEGER v. RichardsNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Green v. MahrAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
3Cited by7 opinions
- Jennings v. Board of ElectionsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Matter of Maio v. McNamaraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- Bodkin v. GarfinkleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Lacorte v. CytrynAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Gregory John Fischer v. Suffolk County Bd. of ElectionsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.