Legal Opinion

Eastalco Aluminum Co. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided October 19, 1989No. Consol. 83-01-00095PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RESTANI, Judge:

This action concerns classification of certain side and bottom carbon blocks used to line a Hall-Heroult aluminum reduction cell in which aluminum is produced through an electrolytic process. The United States Customs Service classified the blocks as electrodes under item 517.61, Tariff Schedules of the United States (1981) (TSUS). In Eastalco Aluminum Company v. United States, 10 CIT 622 (1986) the court ruled that the blocks were not electrodes essentially because the side blocks are not intended to be used as electrodes and because both the bottom blocks and side…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Eastalco Aluminum Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1990
  2. Eastalco Aluminum Company, F.W. Myers & Co., Inc., and Intalco Aluminum Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
  3. Eastalco Aluminum Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1991
  4. Marcel Watch Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API