Legal Opinion
McAlexander v. Ludtke
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided March 28, 1940No. 10954Published
1Opinion of the Court
GRAVES, Justice.
This amended general statement, thought to be correct as such, has been taken from the appellee’s brief:
“The suit was brought by appellee, plaintiff below, to have two instruments, in the form of deeds, reformed to be mortgages, as claimed by him to have been intended by the parties. Appellee alleged that said instruments were given as mortgages to secure a certain indebtedness, which he owed to defendants, and pleaded a tender to defendants of such amount which he owed to them.
“Appellant filed an answer, alleging that such instruments were absolute conveyances, and then filed…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ormsby v. RatcliffeTexas Supreme Court · 1928
- Wichita Falls & Oklahoma Railway Co. v. PepperTexas Supreme Court · 1940
- Traders & General Ins. Co. v. MillikenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
- Perez v. Houston & T. C. R. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Stiles v. Union Terminal Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1928
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.