Legal Opinion

United States v. Hebert

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 15, 1997No. 96-41240PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant-appellant Scyrus Dion Hebert was convicted in the Eastern District of Texas on four counts of bank robbery, eleven counts of use of a firearm during the course of a violent crime, and seven counts of interference with commerce by committing robbery, in violation of the Hobbs Act.1

Hebert appeals his convictions on the following grounds: (1) the Hobbs Act is unconstitutional under United States v. Lopez, 514 U.S. 549, 115 S.Ct. 1624, 131 L.Ed.2d 626 (1995); (2) the district court improperly instructed the jury as to the Hobbs Act; (3) there was insufficient evidence that Hebert *517knowing…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. United States v. GaudinSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Deal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. United States v. Joseph Noel SealsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Billy George Hughes v. Gary L. Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice,institutional DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
  2. United States v. UrbanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
  3. United States v. George Peterson and Pedro SandovalCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
  4. United States v. LankfordCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
  5. United States v. JenningsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API