Legal Opinion

People v. Smith

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 30, 1992No. D013971PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TODD, J.

A jury found Mark Angelo Smith guilty of residential burglary. (Pen. Code, 1 §§ 459, 460.) Smith waived jury trial on seven alleged serious prior felony conviction enhancements, each for residential burglary. (§§ 667, subd. (a), 1192.7, subd. (c)(18).) The trial court found all of them true. The court specifically found that each serious prior felony conviction was “separately brought and tried.” Smith appeals after the court sentenced him to prison for 41 years, consisting of a 6-year upper term for the new residential burglary conviction and 35 years for the 7 enhancements.

Smi…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People v. CoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. People v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. In Re HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  4. People v. EbnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  5. People v. DeayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. WileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. People v. SoriaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  3. People v. WagnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  4. People v. McNeelyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  5. People v. FerrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API