Legal Opinion
Russell v. State
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided June 16, 1969No. 25203PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Undbrcoflhr, Justice.
Enumerations of error are required to be filed separately from the brief. Code- Ann. § 6-810 (Ga. L. 1965, pp. 18, 29, as amended by Ga. L. 1965, pp. 240, 243, and 1968, pp. 1072, 1077). Incorporation of the enumerations of error in the brief fails to comply with this rule and presents nothing for review by this court. Windsor v. Southeastern Adjusters, Inc., 221 Ga. 329 (144 SE2d 739); Cagle v. P. M. C. Development Co., 224 Ga. 515 (162 SE2d 723).
*372Submitted May 13, 1969 Decided June 16, 1969. WilliamS. Cain, for appellant. W. B. Skipworth, District Attorney, Frank K.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Windsor v. Southeastern Adjusters, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1965
- Cagle v. P. M. C. Development Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1968
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ehlers v. Schwall & HeuettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
- Wordu v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
- Moss v. RutzkeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
- Leslie v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- Leslie v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.