Legal Opinion

Permanent Mission of the Republic of Estonia to the United Nations v. Thompson

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 6, 2007No. 06 Civ.3144 RWSPublished

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

The plaintiffs The Permanent Mission of the Republic of Estonia to the United Nations (the “Mission”) and Tiina Intelmann (“Intelmann”) (the “Plaintiffs”), the Ambassador of the Republic of Estonia to the United Nations, brought this action against Alfred Thompson (“Thompson”), Paul Galvin (“Galvin”), New Start, LLC (“New Start” or the “Landlord”), Ruth M. Golod (“Golod”), Bill Martin (“Martin”), Corcoran Group Real Estate (the “Corcor-an Group”), and Benjamin James Associates Inc. (“James Associates”) (the “Defendants”). Based upon the proceedings set forth below…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Park West Management Corp. v. MitchellNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Leris Realty Corp. v. RobbinsCivil Court of the City of New York · 1978
  3. Salvan v. 127 Management Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API