Weil v. State
Supreme Court of Alabama
Appeal from Marengo Circuit Court. Tried before Hon. L. R. Smith. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtBrickell, C. J.
The appellants were indicted in the circuit court of Marengo, for violation of the Revenue Law of 1868. The allegation of the indictment is, that without license, they engaged in, and carried on the business of wholesale dealers in spirituous or vinous liquors. On the trial, but one witness was introduced, and he proved that the defendants were engaged in the business of selling goods and dealing in general merchandise, as merchants in the city of Demopolis, a place of less than five thousand inhabitants. In their store they had dry goods, groceries for family use, whiskey, and a general…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Moore v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1849
- Eubanks v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1850
3Cited by29 opinions
- Martin v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
- Merced County v. Helm & NolanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Manning v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Joseph v. RandolphSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
- Ex parte SiebenhauerNevada Supreme Court · 1879
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.