Legal Opinion

Murphy v. O'Reiley

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided January 23, 1880PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Case 54—EQUITY APPEAL FROM MARION CIRCUIT COURT. 1. The proof clearly shows that the land belongs to appellants, and it should not have been subjected to appellee’s debt. 2. The land was erroneously sold on a credit of three months. (Civil Code, 696.)

1Opinion of the Court

JUDGE COFER

delivered the opinion of.the court.

The appellee, a judgment creditor of John Murphy, brought this suit against Murphy and his wife, attacking a conveyance made by a third person to Mrs. Murphy as fraudulent. Mrs. Khral held a mortgage on the land, executed by Murphy and wife, to secure a debt due from them to the mortgagee, and being made a party, filed an answer, which she made a cross-petition against Murphy and wife.

On hearing, the circuit court adjudged the deed to Mrs. Murphy to be fraudulent as to her husband’s creditors, and adjudged the land to be sold to satisfy the debt…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Land v. Salem BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
  2. Boyd & Usher Transport v. Southern Tank Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1959
  3. Crawley v. CrawleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  4. Shepherd v. HaymondCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API